Gormley Aims To Maximise Public Participation In Planning Process

Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government John Gormley has approved a new structure for fees charged by An Bord Pleanala in relation to appeals, applications and other matters under the Planning Acts.

The introduction of a fee for applications made under the new strategic consent process, provided for under the Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act 2006 constitutes the principal change to the fees structure. This fee has been set at €100,000 per application.

Approvals under the new strategic consent process confer a significant economic gain to developers and it is right and proper that they should contribute towards the costs associated with this process.

Significant increases will be introduced for first party appeals of planning authority decisions on applications for retention of unauthorised development. Where such development requires an EIS the new fee of €9,000 represents a more realistic contribution to the costs involved.


The fee for first party appeals of planning authority decisions on commercial developments will also increase, from the current level of €630 to €1,500 for non-EIS cases and €3,000 for cases where an EIS was submitted as part of the application.

Modest increases - less than half the rate of inflation in the period since the fees were last reviewed in 2003 - are proposed for third party appeals and referrals, from €210 to €220 in each case. No change is proposed at present to the €50 fee for the making of submissions or observations on an appeal case. The same fee will apply for submissions made in respect of applications for strategic infrastructure development. In addition, the fee payable for requests for oral hearings will be almost halved, from €95 at present to €50.

The Minister said: "I'm pleased to approve the Board’s new fee structure. It's vital as far as I’m concerned that applicants under the new strategic consent process pay a fee that is commensurate with the quality of the service being provided to all participants under this new process. I’m also fully supportive of the Board’s move to force individuals responsible for unauthorised development to pay a heavy premium for their actions - this is the right and proper course of action."

(JM)